Thursday, January 29, 2009

Winding down from Learning Technologies

So another Learning Technologies conference and exhibition comes to a close, in fact the tenth - an accomplishment for any event. The organisers may have worried that attendance was going to be affected by the downturn, but they could have saved themselves the sleepless nights - this was by far the busiest and buzziest event yet. How can this be? Well ...

  • There clearly is a heightened interest in e-learning as organisations look to cut budgets and speed up training delivery - in this way e-learning seems counter-recessionary.
  • E-learning seems to be at the tipping point; as an industry we are no longer racked by self-doubt, because we're hearing so many great case studies. We know there's a lot of poor use of technology still, but by and large organisations are learning the lessons and beginning to get it right.

The highlight for me was George Siemens' keynote this morning. I'm a complete convert to connectivism and, for me, his combination of tremendous intellect and cool, confident delivery makes for an absorbing experience. I know his ideas may be a little abstract and academic for some, but I believe it is worth sticking with it and reflecting carefully on what he has to say. A great start is his book Knowing Knowledge.

Some suggestions for next year:

  • With all due respect to my peers who have done a sterling job in provoking thought, let's be on the lookout for the next generation of thought leaders - not just baby boomers in Gen Y clothing but the real thing. Would it be outrageous to suggest a better male/female balance as well?
  • There are controversial issues in learning technology, but we're not experiencing the debate; a bit of Q&A perhaps and a few polite comments, but nothing remotely challenging. The final session was a great example: three excellent speakers in Jay Cross, Charles Jennings and Donald Clark, each putting forward some great ideas, but all more or less in total agreement with each other. And even if they weren't, we'd never have known.

In summary, big thanks go to Donald Taylor and the event organisers for putting together such a worthwhile use of time, money and energy. Here's to ten more years.

5 comments:

  1. Anonymous10:42 PM

    Just to confirm, definitely the busiest Learning Tech event yet. No time to even get a cup of tea the stand was so busy! Fingers crossed for the year ahead. Congratulations to Mark and Ian on organising everything.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'd say the debate bit could be high on the agenda for June's follow-up session.

    I'd say the question time at the end is too short to facilitate any real debate. For example, I would love to see a few of use more (ahem) radical types take on Itiel's learning/recall assumption. Perhaps fewer sessions with longer question times afterwards?

    It might also be interesting to hear from people who face very different challenges from our own, such as the third world, to hear how they're being innovative within their limited affordances.

    Jus' a suggestion...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Clive,

    I agree totally about the level/quantity of debate. There were times in David Wilson's session after he asked the question "why do we need an LMS?" when we could really have opened up conversation amongst the delegates about what is driving learning in their organisation. (Words such as "control", "compliance" etc were stated), but the presentation format didn't allow it.

    I've proposed we move a good chunk of the presentation aspect online, to be viewed in advance - with the conference itself focussed on interaction, dialogue, debate etc - ie, practising what we preach!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous12:18 AM

    Yes a debate would be good with it

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous9:04 PM

    Thanks for the summary Clive, sadly I missed the show - too busy as we hit that tipping point. Did any speakers share anything around evidence of effectiveness of LT?

    ReplyDelete